Post 38b - Magazine Draft feedback

We collected feedback from our target audience for the magazine spread we, as a group, had created. The feedback received was given by those of the ages 16-20 years old, with some members of the group having watched drafts of the film and thus had a clearer take on the review. This feedback has been summarised below by one of my group members:

Pros	Cons	Room for improvement
Layout was neat with image and looks professional.	Font style too small	Small mistakes of punctuation errors and film title in inverted commas
Tone of voice fit that of a review; criticising	Slightly contradictory in places.	Maybe make the writing around the rating system could be clearer.
Directly addressing audience	Some points not clear and needed to be written differently to make more sense.
It gives provides what is good and bad
Not just actors were mentioned, the director was too.
Rating system and the comments were professional
Does not give away plot; entices you to watch film

From the feedback given, one of my group went ahead and make slight changes to the magazine spread in order to fit the needs of our target audience.